Early, not after the audit
The owner hears about the change while there is still time to act – not when the auditor asks.
By situation
By industry
By area
Solutions · Regulatory change
Know which laws apply to you, hear when they change, and see what each change hits – the requirements, the Controls and the contracts that rest on them.
Applicability · Nordbank AB
Sound familiar?
“We find out about a new requirement when the auditor asks.”
“Our contracts were signed under last year's rules.”
“Nobody can say which agreements a change in the law affects.”
Why now
NIS2, DORA and the AI Act have changed the rules for thousands of organisations in a few years – and more will follow. Every change can reach requirements you already meet, routines that run today and contracts signed long ago. The cost is rarely the change itself. It is finding out too late.
How it is usually solved
What good looks like
How it runs in Paragraf
Step 1 of 5
From your facts – country, size, sectors and type of financial entity – Paragraf decides whether NIS2 and DORA apply, and how. Every outcome has its reason, and a person confirms it.
Applicability · Nordbank AB
Step 2 of 5
Law monitoring follows the laws and standards in your register and tells the owner when one changes – what changed, when it applies and what it hits.
Law monitoring
Step 3 of 5
Compare with shows what was added, removed and changed since the edition before – and warns first where a removed requirement was met by one of your Controls.
Compare with · ISO/IEC 27001
Step 4 of 5
Write the requirement into your Playbook and every new contract is reviewed against it before signing. Security promises in signed contracts are matched with your routines, and the gaps show.
Playbook review · DPA, CloudOps AB
Step 5 of 5
Every gap becomes a decision with an owner – change the routine, renegotiate or accept the risk with a reason – and the decision is logged.
Gap · Approval of sub-processors
Coming next
These are on their way and not live yet. Join early, and help shape how they work on your own contracts.
When a law or your Playbook changes, re-check every signed contract against it – and see which ones no longer hold.
See which agreements rest on an earlier template, clause or Playbook version, and which to bring up to date at renewal.
What you get
The owner hears about the change while there is still time to act – not when the auditor asks.
Every change is linked to the requirements, Controls and contracts it reaches, so nobody has to work it out by hand.
A change ends in a decision with an owner and a reason – not in another unread notification.
Hear about the change before the auditor does.
The owner gets the change, what it hits and what to decide – not a newsletter to interpret.

Before you decide
Changing how work is followed up is a real decision. Here is how we make it a safe one.
With one situation, not the whole organisation. We go through your systems and requirements together, set up the first flow with you, and then your teams build further on their own.
No. Start from the contracts, templates and policies you already have. Paragraf takes over the follow-up – who does what, by when, and what proves it.
It stays yours. Everything follows your permissions, sensitive data is masked on the server and every change is logged. Ask us where data is stored and how export works – we answer in writing before you decide.
Start with a limited first scope and clear acceptance criteria, agreed up front. You evaluate on your own data before you expand.
For the buying group
A decision like this involves many people. This is what each of them can say when they bring it to the others.
Next step
Book a walkthrough of your systems and requirements. We show you the thread from requirement to proof – with your own requirements.